Chinese glass bridge on Vimeo

The bridge, which spans the Lianjiang River, has officially been recognized by Guinness World Records as the longest glass-bottomed bridge in the world. We help our customers create, deliver and optimize content and applications. A73 piano station crack for gta. Vmware server 2.0.2 keygen for mac from this source. Element 3d v2 crack spider game. Gibson Research Corporation Proudly Announces The industry's #1 hard drive data recovery software is NOW COMPATIBLE with NTFS, FAT, Linux, and ALL OTHER file systems!

  • KickassCracks Free Cracked Software
  • China shuts glass bridges and walkways over safety fears
  • Glass bridges closed in north China over safety ...
  • China longest glass bridge
  • [4723] BigFish games keymaker – Big Fish all casual games
  • Glass Bridge China Stock Pictures, Royalty-free Photos
  • Steam Community: : Steam Workshop
  • Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator
  • Yuntai Mountain glass tourist bridge in China cracks
  • Famous China Glass Bridge Collapses, Disaster Video: Hoax
That terrifying glass bridge in China? It cracked
1 Construction & Decoration, China Construction & Decoration 96%
2 Corel draw x7 serial number and activation code list 12%
3 Video: World's longest glass bridge opens over Lianjiang 32%
4 Glass coming down, steel going up on Chattanooga's 82%
5 Glass Bridge China Photos and Premium High Res Pictures 43%
6 Scary Journey on Glass Bridge - People are terrified to 85%
7 Glass bridge in china - video dailymotion 2%
8 Amazon.co.uk: Prime Video 100%
9 The Pirate Bay - Download movies, music, games and software 78%
10 China Network Cabinet manufacturer, Server Rack, Network 39%

Top 10 largest software keygen ideas and get free shipping

A Chinese tourism administration is trying to calm tourist fears after cracks began to appear in a glass bridge suspended 3, feet above sea level. Due to genius Citizens, active and not passive Moors such as Taj Tarik Bey, Ras Mariah Bey, Sabir Bey, Anaidah El, Canaanland Moors, etc. North # China 's # Hebei Province makes tourists wonder about safety issue. Download premium images you can't get anywhere else.

China's giant glass bridge hit with sledgehammer - BBC News

However, it turned to be just an interesting feature! China's Hebei Province have all been shut down since last March. Unlike traditional presentation software, like PowerPoint, there's no need to download anything. Surveillance video shows the moment a large group of people crossing a pedestrian bridge in China's Jiangxi province is sent tumbling into the water, triggering a frantic rescue effort. Find reliable China Suppliers, Manufacturers, Wholesalers & Exporters. Types of safety guaranteed glass bridge for sale.


Key 9D glass-bottomed bridge in Xinjiang opens to tourists

Grieves 88 keys and counting zip. While the exercise left ominous looking cracks in the top layer, the cracks are not a threat to the bridge's structural integrity. Zhangjiajie Grand Canyon Glass Bridge is the longest, highest glass-bottom bridge in China. But the adrenaline factor on the bridge levelled up with a new feature rather special effects that make the glass panels on the floor look shattered as and when anyone walks. VIRAL CHOP VIDEOS. Voltaichd 2 5 keygen.

  • Elevated Thyroid Peroxidase Antibody Increases Risk of
  • World's longest glass bridge opens in China at 755ft high
  • Terrifying Glass-Bottomed Bridge in China Cracks
  • Temperature Control, Process Control ...
  • China's Cracking Glass Bridge Prank: Funny or Cruel
  • Glass bridge: China opens world's highest and longest

Sims 4 Reloaded Crack Not Working

A glass-bottomed bridge built on the side of a cliff in China has cracked just weeks after opening to the public. Analysis: Warning: Graphic video in this article. Reagents included SDS-PAGE loading buffer (Beyotime, P0015, China), PageRuler TM Prestained Protein Ladder (Thermo Scientific, 26616, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-BDNF (Merck-Millipore, AB1534SP, Germany, 1: 500 dilution), mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH (Zhongshan Golden Bridge, TA-08, China, 1: 1, 000 dilution), HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (h + l; Immunology Consultants Laboratory, Inc. The 1, foot-long glass-bottom walkway is built along Yuntai Mountain Scenic Park in Henan Province, China. A 218-meter-long glass bridge in Baojing Palace of Yingde, a county-level city in south China's Guangdong Province, opened to tourists on January 16. It is the first glass bridge in the province that is built over karst landscapes and a swan lake. The glass walkway is set to open in August and will stretch across southwest China's Huangguoshu Scenic Area, known for its waterfalls and limestone formations.

Key generator glass Bridge/Skywalk for Sale, Glass Walkway Manufacturer

This name generator will give you 10 random tank names. Video Processing, Security & Delivery Systems; Back to Products Antennas. Recovery Tools Data Recovery Support Technique Zip Drive Camera Cards Disco Duro Windows Operating Systems Marketing Software Tablets. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for. Glass bridge china crack video. An Insane Glass Bridge in China Just Cracked Under Tourists' Feet.


Aubrey Plaza Loves Sauna... - video dailymotion

  • Glass bridge in China - Funny video - Must watch
  • In China, Glass Bridge 'Cracks' With Each Step. Dare To
  • Patch - Everything Local: Breaking News, Events, Discussions
  • Terrifying prank makes tourists think glass bridge is
  • 'Scary' glass bridges shut in Chinese province - BBC News
  • Bigfish Games Keymaker 4151 [22.03.2020], Keygen Universal
  • China Glass Bridges, Top 6 and What is Next for Glass
  • Chinese province closes all glass bridges over safety
  • Stonehenge road tunnel approved despite protests

Keygen glass bridge of China - video dailymotion

Watch the video of the unveiling, with Guinness World Record reps. View my complete profile. Progdvb full crack keygen wikipedia reference. Ice age village hack ifunbox classic https://sneakers-top.ru/forum/?download=4856. Tourists walk through the bridge without any support, just like walking in the air. It gives you complete access to different.

Arlington, VA Patch - Breaking Local News Events Schools

Hero zero hack cheat engine 6.2 music https://sneakers-top.ru/forum/?download=1499. Waterfalls, mountains, volcanoes, polar lights, animals and many others wonderful creations of the Earth. Shapeways is the #1 3D printing service company. Read about a young product designer's passion for design, and what. Video Trump campaign files lawsuit in Arizona demanding a hand count of ballots it says were incorrectly uncounted CBS News 39 Hottest Gifts Of 2020 (Hurry, These Will Be Gone Very Soon). One man is dragged across while another is led by the hand as he.


Hack china Lifting Equipment, Lifting Equipment Manufacturers

The glass bridge is a bridge made of glass and suspended in the air. Residents and visitors to China have reason to be a little nervous about glass-bottomed bridges. We love to create unique, successfull templates for your websites countdown Timer Expired. Acronis disk director full crack https://sneakers-top.ru/forum/?download=4602. Zhangjiajie Grand Canyon Glass Bridge is 60km from the downtown of Zhangjiajie City. Key stage 1 english pdf more info here.

The Importance of Being Candid: On China’s Relationship with the Rest of the World


The Colin Cramphorn Memorial Lecture (I)
The Importance of Being Candid: On China’s Relationship with the Rest of the World
Matthew Pottinger
Deputy National Security Advisor to the President of the United States
Matthew Pottinger is Assistant to the President and US Deputy National Security Advisor. Mr. Pottinger served as the Senior Director for Asia since the start of the Trump Administration in January 2017. In that role, Mr. Pottinger advised the President on Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia, and Oceania, and coordinated U.S. policy for the region.
Before joining the National Security Council staff, Mr. Pottinger ran Asia research at a New York-based investment firm and, prior to that, was the founder of a consultancy serving American investors in East Asia. Mr. Pottinger served as a U.S. Marine, with active duty in Japan and three combat deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, followed by reserve duty at the Pentagon and the Defense Intelligence Agency. Prior to military service, Mr. Pottinger lived and worked in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China from 1997-2005, reporting for Reuters and The Wall Street Journal. He is fluent in Mandarin.
DEAN GODSON: Good afternoon, my name is Dean Godson, I’m Director of Policy Exchange, I have the privilege, pleasure of being your host for this 9th Colin Cramphorn Memorial Lecture. As many of you will know and remember, Colin was the much-loved Chief Constable of West Yorkshire at the time of the 7/7 bombings, the last Deputy Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and first Acting Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland. He was taken from us tragically early by cancer, still remembered with much fondness. We’re delighted that his widow, Lynn, is here with us today online and with other members of the family. I know you will all wish to, on behalf of everyone here, to wish them all the very best and to thank them for continuing to be patrons of this lecture which would have, I know, meant so much to Colin.
As I say, this is the 9th such lecture and our guest of honour today, our keynoter, Matt Pottinger is Deputy National Security Advisor to the President of the United States. He was previously a distinguished journalist with the Wall Street Journal and then joined the US Marine Corps and won combat decorations for his service in Iraq and Afghanistan. He’s one of the leading authorities in the US government on China and that is why uniquely today we are innovating today here at Policy Exchange because as a more than fluent Mandarin speaker, Matt’s address today will be delivered in Mandarin for the sake of audiences across the world and indicating his belief that China is not defined solely by the People’s Republic of China and its representatives, that there is a wider engagement to be had with audiences across the world, Mandarin speaking and others, so good evening to anyone coming in from the Indo Pacific region and China in particular, good morning to all of you in Washington.
Matt, as I say, will make his remarks first in Mandarin and we’ll then open the floor to questions for 35 minutes or so of questions. As I say, we are delighted to be doing this here at Policy Exchange with the importance of this subject of the wider Indo Pacific region and China in particular. We have our own Indo Pacific Commission, chaired by former Canadian Prime Minister Steven Harper, which will be publishing in the near future its findings and it work. Also, because of the particular importance of this subject and because of the proximity to the US Presidential election, we are having actually two Cramphorn Memorial Lectures in close succession, one obviously the one today by Matt Pottinger and the other next week by Dr Kurt Campbell of the Asia Group, one of the leading authorities on Asia from the last Democratic administration of Barack Obama, of particular significance because people are increasingly aware in this country that in an era of polarisation in America, the area of the Indo Pacific and China is one subject where discussion and even a measure of consensus is still possible in the United States. So, thank you to Matt Pottinger for honouring us in this way, we look forward to hearing your unique address and insights and then open to wider discussion, thank you Matt.
I’d like to thank Dean Godson and Policy Exchange for inviting me to deliver the ninth annual Colin Cramphorn lecture. We all look forward to a time when we can gather again in person for events like this. With new vaccines and therapeutics on the near horizon, I’m optimistic that day will soon arrive. In the meantime, let’s pretend we’re at the Red Lion pub and enjoy this convivial, trans-Atlantic video conference between Westminster and the White House. I’m betting on a lively discussion following my set remarks.
As most of you know, England and America are two countries separated by a common language. In order to bridge that divide, I’ve decided to give my remarks in Mandarin.
Truth be told, Dean Godson asked me to bust out my Chinese for the sake of higher ratings. Dean knew that a video of an earlier speech I delivered in Mandarin, about China’s May Fourth movement, was viewed more than one million times. Dean may have also known that a subsequent video I recorded in English for the Ronald Reagan Institute was, by contrast, barely noticed by even my own staff.
Naturally, Dean calculated that a white guy speaking in stilted Mandarin would be a bigger box-office draw than whatever message the white guy might be trying to convey.
So be it. As a character on The Simpsons once put it: “Come for the freak, stay for the food.”
Delivering these remarks in Mandarin has another benefit: It allows friends in China to join a conversation that is taking place with increasing regularity around the globe: A conversation about China’s relationship with the rest of the world.
But first, a smidgen of history to underscore what’s at stake.
Near the end of the 18th century, across the water and many miles from England, a group of visionary men drew up a constitution. The document they framed was designed to limit the powers of government, assert the rights of the people, and chart a path toward what they hoped would be a lasting democracy.
I’m talking, of course, about… Poland.
“Poland?” you ask. Don’t be embarrassed if 1790s Poland didn’t turn up in your high-school textbooks. Unlike the more famous U.S. Constitution, which was adopted just a few years earlier and still serves as the supreme law of the American republic, the Polish experiment with constitutional government was strangled in its infancy.
The problem was foreign interference. A faction of the Polish nobility felt threatened by the influence they would lose under the new constitution. So they sought Russian help in reestablishing the old order. Catherine the Great seized the opportunity to invade and then partition Poland—she took the east and Prussia took the west.
Then, after defeating a revolt led by Tadeusz Kosciuszko, a Polish military hero of the American Revolution, Russia—along with Prussia and Austria—carried out a final partition of Poland-Lithuania in 1795. The young Commonwealth was erased from the map altogether.
I mention Poland’s failed experiment for two reasons: First, it’s a reminder that democracy, while unrivaled in terms of legitimacy and results, is neither invincible nor inevitable. Second, interference in the affairs of free societies by autocratic regimes is a phenomenon that is waxing, not waning.
To stave off meddling, it never hurts to have favorable geography—a luxury Poland didn’t enjoy. Poland’s 18th Century neighbors were powerful European monarchies. America’s neighbors, by contrast, were the two best friends a fledgling democracy could ever ask for—the Atlantic and the Pacific.
But in the cyber age, autocratic governments can concoct disinformation, inject it into the public discourse of nations, and amplify it through self-improving algorithms from the other side of the earth. Are the blessings of oceans and channels sufficient barriers against this sort of meddling?
Not if the citizens of free and sovereign nations yield to complacency. Nations, including democracies, are undergoing the first stage of a real-life “stress test” of their ability to withstand covert, coercive, and corrupt influence by high-tech autocracies.
This may seem odd, because the autocracies are so vastly outnumbered. But they compensate by marshalling the full resources of their states, by learning from one another’s successes and failures, and sometimes by coordinating with one another.
Economic strength isn’t a prerequisite for waging cyber warfare. Thus, we see hackers tasked by Moscow and Tehran attempting to undermine confidence in the upcoming U.S. presidential election. But no regime has more riding on its ability to influence the perceptions, policies and priorities of foreign populations than the Chinese Communist Party.
In truth, we should’ve expected this. The Communist Party’s victory in the Chinese civil war owed less to its combat prowess against superior Nationalist forces than to its ability to infiltrate and manipulate the language, thinking, and actions of its adversaries. This is why the current Party leadership is redoubling its emphasis on “United Front” work.
The defining feature of United Front work is that it’s not transparent. The clue is in the name.
China’s United Front Work system is a gigantic government function with no analogue in democracies. China’s leaders call it a “magic weapon,” and the Party’s 90 million members are required to support its activities. While the system has many branches, the United Front Work Department alone has four times as many cadres as the U.S. State Department has foreign-service officers. But instead of practicing diplomacy with foreign governments—the Chinese foreign ministry handles that—the United Front gathers intelligence about, and works to influence, private citizens overseas. The focus is on foreign elites and the organizations they run. Think of a United Front worker as a cross between an intelligence collector, a propagandist, and a psychologist.
I know that sounds like the opening line to a joke. But United Front work is serious business, and it affects you and me. After all, the raw material for psychologists is data about their patients. The Party is compiling digital dossiers on millions of foreign citizens around the world. The exposure last month of a Chinese database on at least 2.4 million people around the world—including many of us on this call—speaks to the Party’s sheer ambition to wed traditional Leninist techniques with powerful new tools of digital surveillance.
The company building these dossiers, Shenzhen Zhenhua Data Information Technology Co, supports what its CEO reportedly calls “psychological warfare.” Zhenhua harvests and organizes public and private data about us for exploitation by its clients, which are organs of the Chinese security apparatus, according to its website.
The dossiers Zhenhua is compiling include people in virtually every country on earth, no matter how small. They include members of royal families and members of parliament, judges and clerks, tech mavens and budding entrepreneurs, four-star admirals and the crewmembers of warships, professors and think-tankers, and national and local officials. They also include children, who are fair game under Beijing’s rules of political warfare. No one is too prominent or too obscure.
Zhenhua isn’t a particularly large or sophisticated actor in the United Front world. It may even be acting opportunistically, because it thinks the Party will reward it. Far more powerful tech firms, including famous Chinese app developers, play a much bigger role in this kind of work.
Assembling dossiers has always been a feature of Leninist regimes. The material is used now, as before, to influence and intimidate, reward and blackmail, flatter and humiliate, divide and conquer. What’s new is how easy we’ve made it for autocrats to accumulate so much intimate data about ourselves—even people who’ve never set foot in China. We leave our intellectual property, our official documents, and our private lives on the table like open books. The smart phones we use all day to chat, search, buy, view, bank, navigate, network, worship and confide make our thoughts and actions as plain to cyber spooks as the plumes of exhaust from a vintage double-decker bus.
The Chinese Communist Party has reorganized its national strategy around harnessing that digital exhaust to expand the Party’s power and reach.
But what’s the ultimate point of all the data collection and exploitation? What is Beijing trying to influence us to do? The Party’s goal, in short, is to co-opt or bully people—and even nations—into a particular frame of mind that’s conducive to Beijing’s grand ambitions. It’s a paradoxical mindset—a state of cognitive dissonance that is at once credulous and fearful, complacent and defeatist. It’s a mindset that on Monday says “It’s too early to say whether Beijing poses a threat,” and by Friday says “They’re a threat, all right, but it’s too late to do anything about it now.” To be coaxed into such a mindset is to be seduced into submission—like taking the “blue pill” in The Matrix.
How does Beijing do it? This is where United Front propaganda and psychology come into play. The Party’s overseas propaganda has two consistent themes: “We own the future, so make your adjustments now.” And: “We’re just like you, so try not to worry.” Together, these assertions form the elaborate con at the heart of all Leninist movements.
The Kiwi scholar Anne-Marie Brady, a pioneer in sussing out United Front ploys, points to the Party’s global campaigns—“One Belt, One Road” and the “Community of Common Destiny for Mankind”—as classic specimens of the genre.
Brady calls United Front work a “tool to corrode and corrupt our political system, to weaken and divide us against each other, to erode the critical voice of our media, and turn our elites into clients of the Chinese Communist Party, their mouths stuffed with cash.”
The con doesn’t always work, of course. Facts sometimes get in the way. The profound waste and corruption of many One Belt, One Road projects is an example. When the con doesn’t induce acquiescence, the Party often resorts to intimidation and repression.
Take Hong Kong, where demonstrators took to the streets by the millions last year to protest Beijing’s efforts to undermine Hong Kong’s rule of law. If “socialism with Chinese characteristics” was the future, the demonstrators seemed to prefer staying firmly in the present.
So Beijing resorted to Plan B. It demolished Deng Xiaoping’s “One Country, Two Systems” framework and deprived Hong Kong of the autonomy that made it the most spectacular city in Asia.
None of this is reason for panic, mind you. It’s true the West is going through one of its periodic spells of self-doubt, when extreme political creeds surface on the left and the right, and some ideas are so foolish that, to paraphrase George Orwell, only an intellectual could believe them. So let’s pull up our socks and get back to common sense.
On the foreign policy front, President Trump has ingrained two principles worth sharing here, because they’re designed to preserve our sovereignty, promote stability, and reduce miscalculation. They are reciprocity and candor.
Reciprocity is the straightforward idea that when a country injures your interests, you return the favor. It is eminently reasonable and readily understood, including by would-be aggressors. It’s an inherently defensive approach, rooted in notions of fair play and deterrence.
Candor is the idea that democracies are safest when we speak honestly and publicly about and to our friends, our adversaries, and ourselves. This can take some getting used to. When President Reagan was preparing to give a speech in Berlin, several of his staff tried desperately to get him to remove a phrase they found embarrassing and needlessly provocative. Luckily, President Reagan went with his gut, and delivered the most famous line of his presidency: “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.”
Some will argue that confrontational rhetoric turns countries into enemies. This old chestnut of the U.S. diplomatic corps masquerades as humble policy, but is in fact quite arrogant because it presumes nations act primarily in reaction to whatever the United States says or does.
Clever adversaries use such thinking against us. By portraying truth-telling as an act of belligerence, autocrats try to badger democracies into silence—and often succeed. “This is the first and most important defeat free nations can ever suffer,” President Reagan said at Guildhall. “When free peoples cease telling the truth about and to their adversaries, they cease telling the truth to themselves.” Public candor actually promotes peace by reducing the space for strategic blunders.
Public candor applies to our internal affairs, too. There can be no double standard.
When Louis Armstrong performed in the Soviet Union as a cultural ambassador of the State Department, he spoke frankly about racial bigotry in the United States. When Reagan famously referred to the Soviet Union as an “Evil Empire,” he explored America’s own “legacy of evil”—including anti-Semitism and slavery—in the very same speech.
So it is in a spirit of friendship, reflection, and, yes, candor, that I ask friends in China to research the truth about your government’s policies toward the Uyghur people and other religious minorities. Ask yourselves why the editors of The Economist, in a cover article this week, called those policies “a crime against humanity” and “the most extensive violation in the world today of the principle that individuals have a right to liberty and dignity simply because they are people.”
As a Marine who spent three combat deployments fighting terrorists, I can tell you that what is taking place in Xinjiang bears no resemblance whatsoever to an ethical counter-terrorism strategy. Such abuses are what the Chinese diplomat P.C. Chang was trying to prevent when he helped draft the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. There is no credible justification I can find in Chinese philosophy, religion, or moral law for the concentration camps inside your borders.
Colin Cramphorn, for whom this lecture is named, was Chief Constable of West Yorkshire before his death from cancer in 2006. Colin worked the most notorious terrorism cases in British history, from the Omagh car-bombing to the London suicide attacks of 2005. When your day job is to confront evil, it’s hard to avoid dwelling at night on big questions about the human heart. Colin, a voracious and varied reader, sometimes consulted the writings of C.S. Lewis.
I’m told he found particular solace in The Screwtape Letters—Lewis’s brilliantly imagined monologue of a demon toiling in Satan’s bureaucracy. (John Cleese recorded a pitch-perfect rendition of the book a few decades ago, by the way. It’s on YouTube. I’m told Andy Serkis has recorded a version that gives Cleese a run for his money.)
“The safest road to Hell,” old Screwtape advises his nephew, “is the gradual one—the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts.”
I suspect Colin drew hope and courage from the knowledge that evil, properly identified and exposed, is frail—even farcical. And that calling it out in public—giving it “signposts”—inoculates us against temptation and liberates us from fear. As my friend Tony Dolan told me: “The great paradox of institutionalized evil is that it can be enormously powerful but also enormously fragile. Thus, it is compulsively aggressive and ultimately self-destructive. It senses its own moral absurdity. It knows it is a raft on a sea of ontological good.”
“What evil fears most is the publicly spoken truth.”
So speak up, everyone. And raise a glass tonight to the good constable Colin Cramphorn and to like-minded public servants the world over. They have our love and our thanks.
DEAN GODSON: Matt, thank you for a truly brilliant and memorable address. You have now very kindly agreed to answer questions. Just two items of protocol here, please put your virtual hands up and please also look into the camera when you’re speaking because of the exigencies of the virtual event. The final house rule that all of you will be aware of, no question too outrageous, you just have to state your name and organisation before pronouncing. David Brunston, if you can just restate for the record your name and organisation, you wanted to ask a question. David, we can’t hear you. A number of people have been texting in to me, some of them wanted to be asked anonymously, Matt, so if I can use Chairman’s privilege to ask on their behalf. A little more detail, is the strategy, the CCP strategy of wolf diplomacy, is it too far gone now? Could you say more in a bit more detail, they ask, what in your view, the US administration’s perspective, the counter measures should be?
MATT POTTINGER: Dean, thanks so much. You know, I think in a way the wolf warrior diplomacy is an expression of a moment of a kind of desperate opportunism. In a sense, I think as many countries have caught on to the scope of Beijing’s ambitions and have started to push back where they think or the community of nations think they go too far or are damaging to countries sovereignty or interests. I think the process of pushing back has led to a bit of a dropping of the fig leaf, if you will, and this more combative approach to diplomacy, it’s a more coercive approach to diplomacy so I think that what all countries need to do – and this is for the sake of stability by the way, this is in the interest of re-establishing a kind of equilibrium and more constructive, results-oriented relationship between China and the community of nations. I think the two ideas that I talked about in the speech and that are central to President Trump’s approach, the reciprocity but also the candour, will help go quite some way in restoring that balance.
DEAN GODSON: Brilliant, thank you and I’ve been asked to ask the question on behalf of David Brunston of Reuters and the question he wants to ask is how would you expect US policy under a second Trump administration to evolve and how it would differ from a policy that the Biden administration might pursue?
MATT POTTINGER: Yes, so people advising Vice President Biden talk about what he thinks a good policy would be but in terms of President Trump’s approach, I think first you have to take stock of the fact that there is a new consensus and the forging of that new consensus about China is something that has happened under President Trump’s watch, it is in no small part because of the policies that he’s taken and the result has been that it has actually, as you alluded to in the introductory remarks, Dean, it’s a bipartisan, it’s a whole of society consensus and as you read polls popping up all over the world, you see that it’s not just an American consensus anymore either. We’ve led that consensus, that’s been President Trump’s hallmark, probably the most key legacy and shift in American foreign policy in quite some time but there are a lot of other countries that are now starting to, at a minimum, share a very similar consensus on the diagnosis of what the problem is and increasingly, a lot of countries, our European allies, allies across the Indo Pacific region and beyond, who are exploring and in some cases taking similar steps to those that President Trump has advocated for.
DEAN GODSON: Thank you. The next question is from the Right Honourable Lord Mandelson, former Deputy Prime Minister and European Commissioner. Peter, your question if you can come in.
PETER MANDELSON: Dean, thank you very much indeed and I hope you can hear me.
DEAN GODSON: Loud and clear.
RT HON LORD MANDELSON: I have been rather impressed by Matt Pottinger’s lecture and I find myself actually a supporter of both reciprocity and candour and as somebody who, when I was Trade Commissioner, was equally accused of using confrontational rhetoric towards China when I described them as a trade juggernaut out of control, I can see its usefulness. Can I ask though this question to Mr Pottinger? For China in a sense to lose, the West has to win and the West has not been winning during the last four years. With humility and self-criticism, could Mr Pottinger explain to us why he thinks the West has not been strengthened in its coherence and its unity during the last four years and why we have been less able to act in a joined-up way towards China and other international questions than we have during other periods since the Second World War?
DEAN GODSON: Thank you. Matt.
MATT POTTINGER: Thank you, that’s a great question and a great thoughtful prelude to the question as well, thank you. Look, President Trump came in following what I believe and certainly the people who elected him believed was a lengthy period of failure in American foreign policy and really more of a failure of broader foreign policy in the West. We got in lengthy wars under sort of a I think a misimpression that we would be able to inject democracy into far corners of the earth by the barrel of a gun, those have been enormously costly. Those are things that really have done damage, I think, to the West.
China’s entry into the WTO and all of the policies, really the assumptions that led to that and I shared those assumptions 20 years ago so I don’t blame or cast aspersions for what was actually very optimistic bold policy taken by the United States and the West to try to help China become more liberal, first economically and then we hoped politically as well but I think we’ve now taken stock of the fact that some of those assumptions were generous but misplaced. In fact, really the high watermark of China’s opening and liberalisation was December 11th 2001, which I think was the date China entered the WTO. After that, all of those reforms that we so eagerly anticipated by bringing China into the WTO, actually flatlined, things started to plateau for about a decade and over the course of the decade that we’ve just concluded, we saw those reforms go into reverse.
We’ve seen a far greater concentration of power in the hands of the state over the economy, over people’s lives and what we’ve learned is that optimistic period, the reform and opening period if you like, was unfortunately an interregnum, it was an interregnum between the totalitarianism of Mao’s rule and a new technologically enhanced totalitarianism under the current leadership and I’ve heard some refer to it as an attempt at so-called exquisite totalitarianism. I think that that’s a good encapsulation of what has now being attempted, this experiment that Beijing is running to see whether or not it can improve on the failed approach of all the other Leninist states of the 20th century by compensating for the failures of those systems through advanced technology and totalitarian surveillance. So, in short, I think this period that you’re referring to that you characterise as a sort of insufficient pulling together of the West, you’ve got to have a little bit of historical perspective that we’re going through a massive change from the post-Cold War era of the last few decades to a new one that takes stock of some of the failures of the last 30 years. Thanks.
DEAN GODSON: Brilliant, thank you. Next, Deborah Haynes, Foreign Editor, Sky News. Deborah, are you coming in?
DEBORAH HAYNES: Hopefully. Hi, thank you very much, thank you for letting me ask a question and thank you for that fascinating presentation. In terms of how you were describing how the United Front is implementing China’s policies, is what we’re seeing now, given that China is this rising power, a kind of a global battle over ideologies? I mean there’s no rule book that says that China has to adopt the rules based system and carry on using it if it’s the predominant power and if that’s the case, could you just spell out what the danger is if liberal democracies, who are far more fractured now than they have been, if they don’t stand together and stand up for the ideologies of free speech and human rights and all the things that we believe in, that we will see this big global division between those who side with China technologically and ideologically, and those who side with the West, much more than we’ve ever seen before?
MATT POTTINGER: That’s also a great question. So, American foreign policy has had this element, this tradition of realpolitik which, you know, there are nations that calculate on the basis of their own cold self-interest and also running in our veins is this tradition of our own revolutionary liberal democratic world view. They run in our veins like iced water and hot water and hopefully they remain in good enough balance that your blood stays at a good temperature. But you’ve hit on something, the truth is that you cannot ignore the ideological dimensions and ideology is just a fancy word for world view, right. We do have a markedly different world view from the Chinese Communist Party, a different approach to the world, different ideas about quite a lot and that’s not true of China as a whole. The Chinese Communist Party is firmly in command of China, obviously, but China is a lot of things. It is a pretty remarkable civilisation that I have devoted a huge part of my adult life to living in and studying and enjoying and I still do; the history, the culture and the unbelievable drive and energy and entrepreneurialism of the Chinese people. But that ideological dimension is unavoidable and if we try to ignore it, if we try to pretend that it’s only a matter of cold self-interest on both sides, that it’s a Thucydides trap as some like to frame it, I think we’d actually put ourselves on a path towards a more destabilised future than if we were to talk quite frankly to ourselves, our allies and yes, to our adversaries about those differences so that we can avoid miscalculation.
DEAN GODSON: Thank you, Matt. Next question from Alexander Downer, our Chairman of Trustees here at Policy Exchange and, of course, the longest serving Australian Foreign Minister in the country’s history and High Commissioner in London. Alexander.
HON ALEXANDER DOWNER AC: Thanks Dean, I hope you can hear me. I think, speaking as an Australian, it has to be said that we Australians had a fairly solid although not tension-free relationship with China for many years under Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao and Australians have been really taken aback by the aggression in recent years of the Xi Jinping administration so my question is a little bit like Peter Mandelson’s, if there’s a second Trump administration what specific steps will the United States be taking to help countries like Australia which have been targeted by China, particularly Australian trade has been targeted by China, to help build a sense of collective security amongst liberal democracies in the Indo-Pacific region.
MATT POTTINGER: Yes, that’s a great remark that you made and Australia has been in some sense the canary in the coal mine. Australia – by the way, when people claim that provocative and frank, candid language is what causes China to act out in this sort of wolf warrior way, I always point to Australia as well as India as the counter examples there because India and Australia are two countries that had, really went out of their way to extend warmth to China in their people to people and commercial ties. These were countries that did seek to integrate their economies certainly, especially in the case of Australia and yet, when the Australian government just earlier this year had the temerity to ask the World Health Organisation whether there could be a general investigation into the origins of the coronavirus, China retaliated for that wholly reasonable request that Australia made. By the way, the World Health Organisation members voted in the largest majority in the organisation’s history in favour of the motion that Australia raised to investigate the origins, how is it that millions of us now have been infected with this disease? China retaliated by putting tariffs on Australian barley, cancelling beef exports and describing … their arch-propagandist said that Australia is chewing gum stuck to the bottom of China’s shoe and it is time to scrape it off. So, there you have a pretty good counter-argument to the notion that by being extra-friendly to China and hiding some of our candour, that that would lead to a happier bilateral relationship doesn’t stand up.
submitted by wyckhampoint to China


Nugu Roundup #56 -Blooming Boys - 200913 + Album Giveway!

Hello and welcome to the latest Nugu Roundup!
What is this?: This is a weekly feature designed to highlight the unknown/underappreciated groups and soloists working hard in the Kpop world that often fall under the radar. Please share your own information, favorite performance videos, fanmeet stories, or anything else relevant below!
Last week we supported #Hashtag. This week it's time for a boy group who's relatively new but who has been making some very cool music, let's get to know ENOi!
Look at the first comment below for the winner of the tenth Nugu Roundup Album Giveaway, plus details on this week's album up for grabs!
What is Nugu?: While in Korean it literally means 'Who' in the broader Kpop context it refers to groups that are generally unknown amongst the greater public. It doesn't have to mean they're extremely new, though it can, and there are of course varying degrees of 'unknown' which some groups having very strong niche fandoms and others being almost invisible. I take a fairly broad view and will include groups that may be known to some, but who don't have widespread name recognition.
Let's get on with the show...
Who are they?: A seven member boy group under KITHEWHALE Entertainment, their name comes from "wE caN dO iT". The group members have individual colors and gemstones which are meant to represent both positive and negative elements of their personalities, with the concept being that they will grow to be better and overcome their negative aspects. Their fandom name is RAYS which stands for 'Realize All Your Stars' and also carries the meaning that the group can't grow without the rays of light form the fans.
Company: KITHEWHALE Entertainment's name comes from combining the Korean words for 'Lungfish' and 'Whale'. They are a combination IT Company and Kpop Agency and are involved in some way with blockchains. Their goal is to merge their strengths in technology and artistic development. ENOi is their first and only Kpop group, though they have produced Korean hip-hop content in the past.
Full Group Interview
  • Laon
    • Position: Leader, Lead Vocalist
    • Real Name: Shin Kyu Hyun
    • Age: 24 (IA)
    • Facts: He competed in Boys 24, the show that created the group IN2IT, but did not make the final group. He recruited the other members of ENOi and the other members look up to him as a natural leader. He has produced songs for the group including their debut Bloom and their latest comeback Cheeky. He enjoys cooking, '90s music, and playing basketball. His representative colors are Black, White, and Grey, and his representative gemstones are obsidian, diamond, white crystal, and other monochromatic stones. His positive aspects are sacrifice, protection, reason, and order and his negative aspects are vanity, resignation, and solitude.
  • Dojin
    • Position: Main Rapper
    • Real Name: Jeong Yong Tae
    • Age: 23 (IA)
    • Facts: He was the fourth member recruited into the group by Laon and was discovered at the Seoul Fashion Festival where his quick mastery of choreography impressed Laon. Her can play the drums. He can come off as intimidating at first but the other members say he has a warm heart. He loves strawberries and meat. His representative color is green, and his representative gemstones are olivine and emerald. His positive aspects are friendship, sincerity, purity, and thoughtfulness, and his negative anxiety, fear, and revulsion.
  • Hamin
    • Position: Main Vocalist
    • Real Name: Jo Ha Min
    • Age: 22 (IA)
    • Facts: He was the first member recruited into the group by Laon, and the two of them had been good friends previously. His strong vocal skills impressed onlookers during a busking performance when the crowd all became silent to listen when he started singing A Capella. He has an affinity for ballads and can play the piano. While he debuted without them, the glasses he wears have become a trademark of him. His official color is dark blue and his official gemstones are sapphire and lapis lazuli. His positive aspects are chastity, faith, stability, and patience. His negative aspects are apathy, mystery, and blind faith.
  • Avin
    • Position: Vocalist
    • Real Name: Park Dong Hyuk
    • Age: 20 (IA)
    • Facts: He was the sixth member cast by Laon, and was cast after an interview without an audition. He studied Hotel Management and Tourism at Yonsung University. He enjoys gourmet food, desserts, and mountain biking. He handles the filming and video production of much of the group's content. His personality is somewhat reserved on stage but in more intimate situations like fan meets he's known to be one of the most personable members of the group. He can play the piano and speak Chinese. His official color is sky blue. His representative gemstones are chalcedony, turquoise, and aquamarine. His positive aspects are vitality, health, and imagination. His negative aspects are weakness and lack of concentration.
  • Jinwoo
    • Position: Vocalist
    • Real Name: Park Jin Woo
    • Age: 20 (IA)
    • Facts: He was the fifth member recruited into the group and was a schoolmate of Dojin. He has the deepest voice in the group yet is the most aegyo-prone. He enjoys grapefruit, french fries, and cheese. He can do trampoline acrobatics. He is said to resemble the mascot of a Japanese candy company called Peko-Chan. His official color is purple. His representative gemstones are amethyst and rhodolite. His positive aspects are humility, freedom, and peace. His negative are void, disappointment, and desperation.
  • J-Kid
    • Position: Main Dancer, Lead Vocalist
    • Real Name: Han Jeong Hoon
    • Age: 20 (IA)
    • Facts: He was the third member recruited into the group. He is known to always be in motion and unable to sit still. Laon felt his upbeat and energetic attitude would benefit the group. He is very quick to learn choreography and can often learn a dance after just watching it once. He has pierced his own ears. His favorite foods are rice noodles and spring rolls. His official color is yellow. His representative gemstone is citrine. His positive aspects are hope, excitement, and talkativeness, and his negative are frivolity, whimsy, and disrespecting boundaries.
  • Gun
    • Position: Rapper, Vocalist, Maknae
    • Real Name: Yang Hyuk
    • Age: 20 (IA)
    • Facts: He was the last member recruited into the group. His stage name came from when he suggested a pistol move choreography in the group's debut song Bloom. He can play the guitar well and improvise along with songs. He grew up very skinny but got into body building and now is proud of his muscular physique. In addition to gym training he also likes to play soccer. His favorite foods are ramen and meat. His official color is red. His representative gemstones are ruby and garnet. His positive aspects are passion, love strength, loyalty, and courage. His negative aspects are ferocity, mercilessness, and destruction.
Debut: April 21st, 2019 with Bloom (MV) Live Stage (Link) Dance Practice (Link)
  • Song: The group's debut digital single, the song is an autobiographical history of the group comparing them to a blooming flower. With smooth vocal lines and an unexpectedly funky-EDM chorus amidst it's Deep House production it's a fresh debut sound. The title of the song and the lyrics were inspired by Tupac Shakur's book "A Rose that Grew from Concrete".
  • Composers/Producers: Laon (group member), Jin Dae Ho (Punch Sound) (ICIA - Are You Kidding, Romantic City & As One - I Want to Date, Sugar Bowl - Waves From You)
Most Recent Comeback: August 6th, 2020 with W.A.Y (Where are You) (MV) Live Stage (Link) Dance Practice (Link)
  • Song: The lead single from the group's 2nd Special Album "W.A.Y (雨)" this song blends EDM and the Future Bass style with a beguiling chorus and an unexpected hard dubstep dance break.
  • Producers/Composers: Laon (group member), Jin Dae Ho (Punch Sound) (see above), Stendlee (이종준) (no other credits found)
First Comeback: January 12th, 2020 with Cheeky (MV) Live Stage (Link) Choreography Version (Link)
  • Song: The lead single from the group's first EP "Red in the Apple" this is the high point thus far in the group's discography IMO. Opening with a funky guitar riff and playful rapping along with some pseudo-swing vocal lines and simple yet effective percussion giving the track some great momentum this evokes some of Seventeen's more playful songs.
  • Composers/Producers: Laon (group member)
Other Releases
  • Starlight (audio) Showcase Performance (Link) Dance Practice (Link)
    • Song: The first release from the group's first special album "For RAYS, Realize All Your Star" this is a song written for the group's fans. It's a rich and sonorous pseudo-ballad with a driving mid-tempo feel. Laon and Hamin wrote the lyrics.
    • Composers/Producers: UCKU (Floria - Chitty Chitty, DONGKIZ - All I Need is You, Good Day - Rolly), JYMON (Pink Fantasy - Shadow Play, RED SQUARE - Colorful, LC9 - East of Eden)
YouTube Channel: ENOi Official
Random Stuff
Trivia: Member Hamin had been considering giving up on his dream of becoming a singer before Laon convinced him to join the group. Dojin and Jinwoo were students at the same training academy and when Laon approached Dojin he convinced Jinwoo to sign on as well. Avin and Gun were both discovered by Laon through social media and he e-mailed them a presentation about ENOi to convince them to join. Laon was living in a one room studio apartment when he had the idea to form the group, and admits that it was a reckless desire but he's very proud of how they've all come together. The group is known for being perfectionist when it comes to their practice schedule - going through the dance routine for Bloom over 1,500 times before debut, and over 1,000 times for Cheeky to the point where they were sustaining knee injuries but didn't want to water down the choreography or give up.
Soloist of the Week
Grace/Grazy Grace
Who is she?: Grace is currently an independent soloist/singer-songwriter. She was previously promoted by YYAC but is currently involved in a contract dispute with them. She is Korean American, born in Long Island, but traveled Korea as a trainee though never debuted with a group, later gaining attention competing in Unpretty Rapstar 3. She is known for sharing stories from behind the scenes of the Kpop system on her YouTube channel.
Solo Debut: February 4th, 2016 with I'm Fine (MV) Live Performance (Link) Dance Practice (Link)
  • Song: A fun pop-hip-hop track with a cheeky attitude. The song is inspired by the Miami hip-hop scene of the '90s.
  • Composers/Producers: Sammy Sosa (새미소사) (Bobby Moon - Watch Out (feat. Donghae))
Most Recent Comeback: June 29th, 2020 with Planet (MV)
  • Song: An English song with an EDM/Dance focus and a strong vocal line. This is her first release not promoted with YYAC. It was a collaboration with Folded Dragons, a Chinese-American producer who sadly recently passed away.
  • Composers/Producers: Grace (original artist), Folded Dragons (Sori - I Am Not Alone, Ian Kim - Up in the Air)
Other MVs and Releases
  • Trick or Treat (MV) Live Performance (Link) Choreography Video (Link)
    • Song: With lyrics comparing trick-or-treating to knocking on men's hearts, the song is in the synth-bass style.
    • Composers/Producers: Grace (original artist), Nassun (Fanatics - Sunday, Kim Sori - Bikini, KARD - Oh NaNa), Victon (ACE - Favorite Boys, KARD - Hola Hola, SECHSKIES - Back Hug)
  • Zombie High (MV) Live Performance (Link)
    • Song: A harder hip-hop style song, this didn't receive much budget for the MV but it became one of her more popular songs
    • Composers/Producers: Grace (original artist), DAX (Gray - Moon Blue, Girls' Day - Female President, MINX - Love Shake)
  • Because of You (MV)
    • Song: A strong vocal-driven ballad that reminds me quite a bit of Hyolyn's more soulful work.
    • Composers/Producers: Grace (original artist), ILPK (T2M - From Her to Me, Cherry on Top - Hi Five)
YouTube Channel: Grazy Grace and Grazy TV and YYAC Official
Random Stuff
Trivia: The English bios I've found all state that she was born in Long Island, NY, however her Korean bio on the namu.wiki indicates that she was born in Seoul and emigrated to the USA at age 7, I'm not sure which is correct. She was eliminated from Unpretty Rapstar in the 8th episode. She created the hook for the Unpretty Rapstar Season 3 theme song "She's Coming". While she has never publicly stated it, it's widely assumed that her trainee experience was in Nega Network/NH Media as part of the group that eventually became Laboum. She is friends with former Rania member Alex and H.U.B member Hyosun. She's a fan of sushi and mexican food. She holds a lifeguard certificate. She has been quite candid about her experiences in the Kpop industry on her YouTube channel, including stories about some of the less-glamorous behind the scenes issues such as encouragement of plastic surgery, sexual propositions, and body shaming issues. ________________________________________________________
Who were they?: A six member girl group under Parksal Entertainment. The group was made up of Racing Models, and stood for "Perfect Performance Ladies".
Company: Parksal Entertainment had a highly-anticipated pre-debut girl group known as Rendezvous which has disbanded prior to debut, though their main vocalist Seulgi will be debuting as a soloist. They also represent former PPL member Ah Hee who now promotes as DJ Fatal, ballad duo Premu, and a number of models. They also appear to be involved in various other business activities such as watersports equipment rental, video production, and vaping products.
MVs and Releases
  • Rush (MV) Live Performance (Link) Dance Practice (Link)
    • Song: An EDM Dance Song that feels like it would be at home in a club or a stage performance
    • Composers/Producers: Taejo Yang Geon (태조양건) (FLASHE - Popping, FLASHE - Baby Lotion, Pung Deng - POONGDUNG)
  • Watch Me (MV) Live Performance (Link) Vertical Choreography Video (Link) Remix Ver (1st MV) (2nd MV)
    • Song: Another dance song, but with a stronger hip-hop element and a bit of flirty-sexy summer appeal. There was also a Chinese version of this single released.
    • Composers/Producers: Taejo Yang Geon (태조양건) (see above), Byrent (no other credits found)
  • Shoot U (MV) Live Performance (Link) Dance Practice (Link) Summer Version (MV)
    • Song: The group's final release, and their highest budget MV with a fun western theme. The song is also their best work with a catchy hook, a real chorus, and and sassy vocal delivery and includes some musical references to the western theme with some great twangy guitar work.
    • Composers/Produceres: DanDi (단디) (Hari - Gwiyomi, Saturday - Bbyong, BADKIZ - Ear Attack)
Active Between: October 30th 2015 - Sometime in 2018
Reasons for Disbanding: In early 2018 the company announced that they would be replacing four members of the group, however the replacements never debuted and one of the remaining two, Ah Hee, began working under the company as a DJ. All other activity ceased and the group's YouTube channel was replaced with one hawking vaping devices.
Trivia: Member Ah Hee is now active as a model and as DJ Fatal. Member Da Hee married the CEO of Parksal Entertainment in December 2018 and afterwards it was revealed they had been dating for six years (which would have included the entire run of the group). Member Gakyung was named the 10th most beautiful woman in the world by fashion magaine MODE and appeared in Top Gear Korea. She continues as a model. Member Yujin was previously a law student but didn't feel it suited her, she is currently working as a model following the breakup of the group. Member Azi was Miss Korea 2008. Member Sol A dreamt of becoming a kindergarten teacher and getting married quickly but did not follow through with those plans. A Chinese fan once flew from China to give her gold on her birthday. She is currently working as a model.
That's it for today, let's get the discussion on!
As always, if you have any suggestions for groups, content, or things you'd like to see, please let me know in the comments below.
Also as always, a big shout-out to u/not-named-in-credits for founding nugutown and u/sharnaranwan for continuing the work over there.
submitted by tutetibiimperes to kpop